Refine
Document Type
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (5)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (4)
- Opinion Mining (3)
- Sentiment Analyse (3)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (2)
- corpus linguistics (2)
- Informationswissenschaft (1)
- Lexikographie (1)
- Sentiment Analysis (1)
- Sentimentanalyse (1)
- computational linguistics (1)
Institute
The workshops hosted at this iteration of KONVENS also reflect the interaction of, and common themes shared between, Computational Linguistics and Information Science: a focus on on evaluation, represented by shared tasks on Named Entity Recognition (GermEval) and on Sentiment Analysis (GESTALT); a growing interest in the processing of non-canonical text such as that found in social media (NLP4CMC) or patent documents (IPaMin); multi-disciplinary research which combines Information Science, Computer Aided Language Learning, Natural Language Processing, and E-Lexicography with the objective of creating language learning and training systems that provide intelligent feedback based on rich knowledge (ISCALPEL).
We present the German Sentiment Analysis Shared Task (GESTALT) which consists of two main tasks: Source, Subjective Expression and Target Extraction from Political Speeches (STEPS) and Subjective Phrase and Aspect Extraction from Product Reviews (StAR). Both tasks focused on fine-grained sentiment analysis, extracting aspects and targets with their associated subjective expressions in the German language. STEPS focused on political discussions from a corpus of speeches in the Swiss parliament. StAR fostered the analysis of product reviews as they are available from the website Amazon.de. Each shared task led to one participating submission, providing baselines for future editions of this task and highlighting specific challenges. The shared task homepage can be found at https://sites.google.com/site/iggsasharedtask/.
We study the influence of information structure on the salience of subjective expressions for human readers. Using an online survey tool, we conducted an experiment in which we asked users to rate main and relative clauses that contained either a single positive or negative or a neutral adjective. The statistical analysis of the data shows that subjective expressions are more prominent in main clauses where they are asserted than in relative clauses where they are presupposed. A corpus study suggests that speakers are sensitive to this differential salience in their production of subjective expressions.
In this paper, we report on an effort to develop a gold standard for the intensity ordering of subjective adjectives. Rather than pursue a complete order as produced by paying attention to the mean scores of human ratings only, we take into account to what extent assessors consistently rate pairs of adjectives relative to each other. We show that different available automatic methods for producing polar intensity scores produce results that correlate well with our gold standard, and discuss some conceptual questions surrounding the notion of polar intensity.
